The Confiscations of Jewish Property in Ukraine during World War II and the Problem of Restitution

Main Article Content

Abstract

The plundering and extermination of Jews is one of the important problems of modern history, which is still insufficiently studied and requires further thorough academic research both in Ukraine and in the international arena. Therefore, the problems of searching for Jewish property seized during the Holocaust, the search for former owners (or their descendants) are among the insurmountable consequences of World War II. It is hoped that studying and taking into account the mistakes made at that time that led to the catastrophe will allow us to avoid their repetition now and in the future.


The proposed article reveals that currently in Ukraine not enough measures have been taken to return Jewish property illegally seized during the Holocaust or to compensate for its loss. The reasons for this situation were that the Holocaust in the USSR was practically forgotten, not written about, and almost not studied. This topic was practically taboo during the Soviet regime. The situation has changed only since the so-called perestroika and already in the post-Soviet era. Therefore, in Ukraine in recent decades, many projects have appeared dedicated to Jewish history and its terrible pages during the Second World War. Nowadays, the development of such topics is often financed from the state budget and this gives reason to hope for thorough research. Traces of Jewish life have become visible again, memorials have been erected and mass graves have been restored, that is, an important fundamental approach has become the study of the pages of Ukrainian Jews as an integral part of the history of Ukraine.


However, there is still only a small number of works whose authors analyze the topic of confiscations of property from Ukrainian Jews. The author of the article sees a positive trend in the fact that more and more projects and publications are appearing that examine Jewish traces at the local and microhistorical levels, this is a study of the robbery of Jews in Kyiv, Berdychiv, Zhytomyr, Ruzhyn, in the towns of Volhynia and many others.


At the same time, the vast majority of those who were lucky enough to survive and experience this terrible tragedy of humanity have not yet been able to return the property seized during World War II, and they have not been paid compensation. The article correctly reveals the state of work on this problem in Ukraine, shows individual successes and obstacles that hinder restitution or make it impossible to implement it at all. The legislative framework is outlined, its current shortcomings are shown, and recommendations are made to improve the possibilities of solving a whole range of tasks that would make restitution real and inevitable.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Soloshenko, V. (2025) “The Confiscations of Jewish Property in Ukraine during World War II and the Problem of Restitution”, Problems of World History, (30), pp. 170–182. doi: 10.46869/2707-6776-2025-30-9.
Section
Articles
Author Biography

V. Soloshenko

Soloshenko Viktoria – Ph.D. in History, Associate Professor, Deputy Director of Scientific Work of the State Institution “Institute of World History of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine”.

References

Istoryk Anatolii Podolskyi: Stalinska dyktatura takozh vidpovidalna za Holokost, iakyi vchynyly natsysty (2025, 3 liutoho). Interv’iu z Ukrainy. [Online]. Available from: https://rozmova.wordpress.com/2025/02/03/anatoliy-podolskyi-5/ [In Ukrainian].

Podolskyi, A.Yu. (2017). Ukrainski akademichni studii z istorii Holokostu: novi teoretychni tendentsii i politychni pidteksty. Rozvytok i vzaiemodiia ievreiskykh hromad na yevropeiskomu prostori: monohrafiia. Kyiv: IPiEND im. I.F. Kurasa NAN Ukrainy [In Ukrainian].

Chervonenko, V. (2020, 29 veresnia). Holokost: 10 mist nаimаsovishykh rozstriliv yevreiv Ukrainy. BBC News Ukraina. [Online]. Available from: https://www.bbc.com/ukrainian/features-54279487 [In Ukrainian].

“Never again” is now, President von der Leyen says ahead of International Day of Holocaust Remembrance (2024, January 26). European Commission. [Online]. Available from: https://enlargement.ec.europa.eu/news/never-again-now-president-von-der-leyen-says-ahead-international-day-holocaust-remembrance-2024-01-26_en [In English].

Soloshenko, V.V. (2023). Chy bahato tsinnykh rechei zalyshalosia v susidiv pislia pohrabuvannia ukrainskykh yevreiv? Problemy vsesvitnoi istorii, 3(23), pp. 173–185. [In Ukrainian].

Goschler, C., Ther, Ph. (eds.) (2003). Raub und Restitution. 'Arisierung' und Rückerstattung des jüdischen Eigentums in Europa. Frankfurt/Main: Fischer Taschenbuch Verlag [In German].

Ludi, R. (2012). Reparations for Nazi Victims in Postwar Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press [In English].

Ludi, R. (2018). Second-wave Holocaust restitution, post-communist privatization, and the global triumph of neoliberalism in the 1990s. Yod. Revue des études hébraïques et juives, 21, pp. 1–30. [Online]. Available from: https://www.zora.uzh.ch/id/eprint/158247/1/Ludi_Second_wave_Holocaust_restitution.pdf [In English].

Weinbaum, L. (2001). Defrosting History: The Restitution of Jewish Property in Eastern Europe. In: Beker, A. (eds) The Plunder of Jewish Property during the Holocaust. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 83–110. [Online]. Available from: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1057/9780333985281_5 [In English].

Alker, S., Bauer, B., Stumpf, M. (2017). NS-Provenienzforschung und Restitution an Bibliotheken. Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter Saur [In German].

Akulenko, V. (2019). Cultural values as bargaining chips of Ukrainian national interests. Pamiatky Ukrainy, 1, pp. 20–28. [Online]. Available from: https://lostart.org.ua/pict_mod/pictures/210_item_file_yaya129.pdf [In Ukrainian].

Boryak, H. (1995). Bremens’kyi proekt “Dolia kulturnykh tsinnostei, vyvezenykh z SRSR pid chas druhoi svitovoi viiny” (FRN): Kameral’ni metodyky i problemy doslidzhennia istorii arkhivnykh dokumentiv. Povernennia kulturnoho nadbannia Ukrainy: problemy, zavdannia, perspektyvy, 6, pp. 251–260. Kyiv. [In Ukrainian].

Zakirova, S. (2016). Restytutsiia: PRO ET CONTRA (chastyna persha). Yevropeiskyi dosvid i praktyka zaprovadzhennia restytutsii. Hromadska dumka pro pravotvorennia, 22 (125), pp. 4–16. [Online]. Available from: https://nbuviap.gov.ua/images/informaciyni_vidanya/grom_dumka/2016/Gromadska_dumka_2016_22.pdf [In Ukrainian].

Zakirova, S. (2017). Restytutsiia: PRO ET CONTRA (chastyna druha). Ukrainski realii problemy restytutsii. Hromadska dumka pro pravotvorennia, 1 (126), pp. 3–9. [Online]. Available from: https://nbuviap.gov.ua/images/informaciyni_vidanya/grom_dumka/2017/Gromadska_dumka_2017_1.pdf [In Ukrainian].

Opanasenko, O.I. (2015). Restytutsii v konteksti Yevropeiskykh domovlenostei. Hileia: naukovyi visnyk, 94, pp. 66–71. [In Ukrainian].

Radievska, T., Sebta, T., Sorokina, S. (2018). Z istorii zibran’ Natsional’noho muzeiu istorii Ukrainy: peremishchennia na zakhid ta restytutsiia zbirok u 1943–1948 rr. Naukovyi visnyk Natsional’noho muzeiu istorii Ukrainy, 3, pp. 15–52. [Online]. Available from: https://lostart.org.ua/pict_mod/pictures/214_item_file_yaya129.pdf [In Ukrainian].

Soloshenko, V. (2020). Plundered and looted art as a focus of remembrance: Ukrainian and Russian cases. Social and Human Sciences. Polish-Ukrainian scientific journal, 01 (25). [Online]. Available from: https://sp-sciences.io.ua/s2734537/soloshenko_viktoriia_2020_._plundered_and_looted_art_as_a_focus_of_remembrance_ukrainian_and_russian_cases._social_and_human_sciences._polish-ukrainian_scientific_journal_01_25_ [In English].

Dean, M., Goschler, C., Ther, P. (eds.) (2008). Robbery and Restitution: The Conflict over Jewish Property in Europe. New York: Berghahn Books, pp. 68–96. [In English].

Restytutsiia ekspropriikovanoi vlasnosti v svitli yevrointehratsii Ukrainy ta yevropeiskoho prava. [Online]. Available from: https://brightonbeachnews.com/rus/restitucia-news/ [In Ukrainian].

Kot, S.I. (2020). Povernennia i restytutsiia kulturnykh tsinnostei u politychnomu ta kulturnomu zhytti Ukrainy (XX – pochatok XXI st.). Kyiv: Instytut istorii Ukrainy NAN Ukrainy [In Ukrainian].

Soloshenko, V.V. (2005). Ukrainsko-nimetski vidnosyny u 90-kh rokakh XX st. Spetsialnist 07.00.02 – Vsesvitnia istoriia. Avtoreferat. Kyiv: KSU. [In Ukrainian].

Polozhennia pro poriadok vyplaty hroshovoi kompensatsii, povernennia maina abo vidshkoduvannia yoho vartosti reabilitovanym hromadianam abo yikhnim spadkoiemtsiam. Postanova Kabinetu Ministriv URSR № 48 vid 24 chervnia 1991 roku. [Online]. Available from: https://zakon.cc/law/document/read/48-91-%D0%BF [In Ukrainian].

Proekt Zakonu pro vidnovlennia prav vlasnosti fizychnykh osib na maino, prymusovo vidchuzhene orhanamy SRSR. № 8332 vid 21 zhovtnia 2005 roku. [Online]. Available from: https://w1.c1.rada.gov.ua/pls/zweb2/webproc4_1?id=&pf3511=25859 [In Ukrainian].

Shchur, M. (2015, 21 sichnia). Restytutsiia v Ukraini. Realii i perspektyvy. Radio Svoboda. [Online]. Available from: https://www.radiosvoboda.org/a/26806299.html [In Ukrainian].

Smolii, V.A. (2016). Istoryko-kulturna spadshchyna Ukrainy: peremishchennia, vtraty, perspektyvy povernennia (stenohhrama naukovoi dopovi di na zasedanni Prezidii NAN Ukrainy 2 hrudnia 2015 r.). Visnyk Natsionalnoi akademii nauk Ukrainy, 2, pp. 33-39. [Online]. Available from: http://jnas.nbuv.gov.ua/article/UJRN-0000481309 [In Ukrainian].

Best Practices for the Washington Conference Principles on Nazi-Confiscated Art (2024, March 5). U.S. Department of State. [Online]. Available from: https://www.state.gov/office-of-the-special-envoy-for-holocaust-issues/best-practices-for-the-washington-conference-principles-on-nazi-confiscated-art [In English].

Terezynska Deklaratsiia (2009). Zabuta Spadshchyna. [Online]. Available from: https://lostart.org.ua/ua/docs/74.html [In Russian].

Zisel's I. Restitutsiya yevreyskoy sobstvennosti v Ukraine: postanovka voprosa. Yevroaziatskiy yevreyskiy congress. [Online]. Available from: https://web.archive.org/web/20140415121748/http:/eajc.org/page18/news14007 [In Russian].

Pro zakhody shchodo povernennia relihiynym orhanizatsiiam kultovoho maina. Ukaz Prezydenta Ukrainy vid 04.03.1992 № 125. [Online]. Available from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/125/92#Text [In Ukrainian].

Shchodo zabezpechennia poetapnoho povernennia relihiynym orhanizatsiiam kultovykh budivel, yaki ne vykorystovuiutsia abo vykorystovuiutsia ne za pryznachennyam. Rozporyadzhennia Kabinetu Ministriv Ukrainy vid 07.05.1998 № 290-r. [Online]. Available from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/290-98-%D1%80#Text [In Ukrainian].