Theoretical Reflection of the Problems of Correlation of Social Ideals and Political Interests

Main Article Content

Abstract

The article explores the theoretical reflection of the ratio of social ideals and political interests. The main approaches to the motivation of political activity and ideas about the most perfect social system
are highlighted. The scientific heritage of K. Marx and K. Mannheim is analyzed in detail on this issue and it is determined that large social groups (classes) present their interests in the form of ideals, or,
in other words, social values and ideals are a concentrated expression (incl. and political) class interests. It is proved that ideas about social ideals and political interests have always been determined historically, being formed under the direct influence of the most important events in the international arena and the main domestic political trends. Thus, one can speak not only about the
interdependence of socio-political processes and knowledge about them, when theoretical ideas about society are a kind of reflection of its state and structure, and on the other hand, social relations appear to be objective knowledge about them (i.e., an empirical embodiment of ideas and concepts), but also about the synchronized dynamics of the evolution of social theory and historical practice, when scientific ideas develop in parallel with real social changes, creating two parallel dynamics – the intellectual and factual.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

| Abstract views: 52 | PDF Downloads: 37 |

Article Details

How to Cite
Rozumyuk, V. and Vasyltsiv, O. (2019) “Theoretical Reflection of the Problems of Correlation of Social Ideals and Political Interests”, Problems of World History, (9), pp. 34-72. doi: 10.46869/2707-6776-2019-9-2.

Section
Articles
Author Biographies

V. Rozumyuk

Rozumyk Volodymyr – Ph.D. in Political Sciences, Senior Research Fellow, Leading Research Fellow of the State Institution “Institute of World History of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine”

O. Vasyltsiv

Vasyltsiv Oleksandra – Junior Research Fellow of the State Institution “Institute of World History of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine”

References

Fukydyd. Ystoryja. – M.: Ladomyr; OOO «Fyrma «Yzdatel'stvo AST», 1999. – 730 s.

Knyga pravytelja oblasty Shan (Shan Czjun' Shu). – M.: Ladomyr, 1993. – 392 s.

Besedy y suzhdenyja Konfucyja. – SPb.: OOO «Yzdatel'stvo “Krystall”», 2001. – 1120 s.

Arthashastra yly Nauka o polytyke. – M.: Ladomyr, Nauka, 1993. – 794 s.

Oppenhejm A. Drevnjaja Mesopotamyja. Portret pogybshej cyvylyzacyy. – M.: Nauka, Glavnaja redakcyja vostochnoj lyteratury, 1990. – 319 s.

Arystotel'. Polytyka. – M.: AST: AST MOSKVA: HRANYTEL'', 2006. – 393 s.

Ksenofont. Kyropedyja. – M.: Nauka, 1977. – 336 s.

Ysokrat. Rechy. Pys'ma. – M.: Ladomyr, 2013. – 1074 s.

Polybyj. Vseobshhaja ystoryja v soroka knygah. V 3-h tomah. – SPb: Nauka, Juventa – 1994. – T. I. – 496 s.

Sebajn Dzh., Torson T. Istorija politychnoi' dumky / Dzhordzh G. Sebajn, Tomas L. Torson ; per. z angl. – K.: Osnovy, 1997. – 838 s.

Cyceron. Dyalogy. O gosudarstve. O zakonah. – M.: Nauka, 1966. – 224 s.

Dygesty Justynyana / Perevod s latynskogo; otv. red. L.L. Kofanov. – M.: «Statut», 2002. – 584 s.

Byblyja. Knygy svjashhennogo pysanyja Vethogo y Novogo Zaveta. – M.: Rossyjskoe byblejskoe obshhestvo 2001. – 925 s. + 292 s.

Avgustyn Blazhennyj. O Grade Bozh'em // Blazhennyj Avgustyn. Tvorenyja: v 4-h t. – SPb.: Aleteja, K.: UCYMM-Press, 1998. – T. 3. – 594 s.

Makyavelly N. Sochynenyja. – SPb.: Krystall, 1998. – 656 s.

Gobbs T. Sochynenyja: v 2-h t. – M.: Mysl', 1989. – T. 2. – 732 s.

Spynoza B. Yzbrannye proyzvedenyja: v 2-h t. – M.: Gospolytyzdat, 1957. – T. 2. – 728 s.

Bodin J. The Six Books of Commonwealth. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1962. – 512 r.

Ryshel'jo A. Polytycheskoe zaveshhanye, yly pryncypy upravlenyja gosudarstvom. – M.: Ladomyr, 2008. – 496 s.

Labrjujer Zh. Haraktery, yly nravy nyneshnego. – M.: AST: Tranzytknyga, 2005. – 412 s.

Mor T. Utopyja. Jepygrammy. Ystoryja Rycharda III. – M.: Ladomyr; Nauka, 1998. – 464 s.

Kampanella T. Gorod Solnca. – M.: Yzdatel'stvo Akademyy nauk SSSR, 1954. – 228 s.

Kyssyndzher G. Dyplomatyja. – M.: Ladomyr, 1997. – 850 s.

Marks K. K krytyke polytycheskoj jekonomyy // Marks K., Jengel's F. Sochynenyja. V 50-ty tomah. – M.: Yzd-vo polytycheskoj lyteratury, 1959. – T. 13. – S. 1-167.

Marks K. Nyshheta fylosofyy. Otvet na «Fylosofyju nyshhety» g-na Prudona // Marks K., Jengel's F. Sochynenyja. V 50-ty tomah. – M.: Yzd-vo polytycheskoj lyteratury, 1955. – T. 4. – S. 65-185.

Marks K. Kapytal. Predyslovye k pervomu yzdanyju // Marks K., Jengel's F. Sochynenyja. V 50-ty tomah. – M.: Yzd-vo polytycheskoj lyteratury, 1960. – T. 23. – S. 5-11.

Gramshy A. Yskusstvo y polytyka. V 2-h t. – M.: Yskusstvo, 1991. – T. 1. – 432 s.

Veber M. Yzbrannye proyzvedenyja. – M.: Progress, 1990. – 808 s.

Pys'ma F. Jengel'sa k raznym lycam. Pys'mo k Jozefu Blohu 21(22) sentjabrja 1890 goda // Marks K., Jengel's F. Sochynenyja. V 50-ty tomah. – M.: Yzd-vo polytycheskoj lyteratury, 1960. – T. 37. – S. 393-397.

Al'tjusser L. Za Marksa. – M.: Praksys, 2006. – 392 s.

Marks K., Jengel's F. Nemeckaja ydeologyja. Krytyka novejshej nemeckoj fylosofyy v lyce ejo predstavytelej Fejerbaha, B. Baujera y Shtyrnera y nemeckogo socyalyzma v lyce ego razlychnyh prorokov // Marks K., Jengel's F. Sochynenyja. V 50-ty tomah. – M.: Yzd-vo polytycheskoj lyteratury, 1955. – T. 3. – S. 7-544.

Marks K. Vosemnadcatoe brjumera Luy Bonaparta // Marks K., Jengel's F. Sochynenyja. V 50-ty tomah. – M.: Yzd-vo polytycheskoj lyteratury, 1957. – T. 8. – S. 115-217.

Marks K. K krytyke gegelevskoj fylosofyy prava // Marks K., Jengel's F. Sochynenyja. V 50-ty tomah. – M.: Yzd-vo polytycheskoj lyteratury, 1955. – T. 1. – S. 414-429.

Kautskyj K. Proyshozhdenye hrystyanstva. – M.: Polytyzdat, – 1990. – 463 s.

Marks K. Peredovyca v № 179 «KOLNISCHE ZEITUNG» // Marks K., Jengel's F. Sochynenyja. V 50-ty tomah. – M.: Yzd-vo polytycheskoj lyteratury, 1955. – T. 1. – S. 93-113.

de Tokvil' A. Davnij porjadok i revoljucija. – K.: Junivers, 2000. – 224 s.

Marks K., Jengel's F. Svjatoe semejstvo, yly krytyka krytycheskoj krytyky. Protyv Bruno Baujera y kompanyy // Marks K., Jengel's F. Sochynenyja. V 50-ty tomah. – M.: Yzd-vo polytycheskoj lyteratury, 1955. – T. 2. – S. 3-230.

Lukach G. Ystoryja y klassovoe soznanye. Yssledovanye po marksystskoj dyalektyke. – M.: «Logos-Al'tera», 2003. – 416 s.

Gramshy A. Yzbrannye proyzvedenyja. V 3-h t. – M.: Yzdatel'stvo ynostrannoj lyteratury, 1959. – T. 3. – 566 s.

Marks K. Tezysy o Fejerbahe // Marks K., Jengel's F. Sochynenyja. V 50-ty tomah. – M.: Yzd-vo polytycheskoj lyteratury, 1955. – T. 3. – S. 1-4.

Marks K. Pys'ma yz «DEUTSCH-FRANZOSISCHE JAHRBUCHER» // Marks K., Jengel's F. Sochynenyja. V 50-ty tomah. – M.: Yzd-vo polytycheskoj lyteratury, 1955. – T. 1. – S. 371-381.

Marks K. Kommunyzm y augsburgskaja «ALLGEMEINE ZEITUNG»// Marks K., Jengel's F. Sochynenyja. V 50-ty tomah. – M.: Yzd-vo polytycheskoj lyteratury, 1955. – T. 1. – S. 114-118.

Marks K. Zametky o novejshej prusskoj ynstrukcyy // Marks K., Jengel's F. Sochynenyja. V 50-ty tomah. – M.: Yzd-vo polytycheskoj lyteratury, 1955. – T. 1. – S. 3-27.

Mangejm K. Dyagnoz nashego vremeny. – M.: Juryst,1994. – 700 s.

Merton R. Socyal'naja teoryja y socyal'naja struktura. – M.: AST: AST MOSKVA: HRANYTEL'', 2006. – 873 s.

Nycshe F. Sochynenyja. V 2-h tomah. – M.: Mysl'. 1990. – T. 1. – 830 s.

Lebon G. Psyhologyja socyalyzma. – Spb: Maket, 1995. – 541 s.

Morgenthau H.J. Politics among nations. The struggle for power and peace. – New York: Alfred-A-Knopf, 1978. – 560 p.

Cook T. Foreign Policy – The Realism of Idealism // The American Political Science Review. – 1952. – June. – Vol. 46. – № 2. – R. 343-356.

Tannenbaum F. The American Tradition in Foreign Relations // Foreign Affairs. – 1951. – October. – Vol. 30. – № 1. – R. 31-50.

Spanier J. The Truman-McArthur Controversy and the Korean War. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1959. – 311 r.

Rostow W. The Diffusion of Power. An Essay in Recent History. – N.Y.: Macmillan, 1972. – 739 r.

Morgenthau H. A New Foreign Policy for the United States. – N.Y.: Frederick A. Praeger, 1968. – 252 r.

Modelski G. A Theory of Foreign Policy. – N.Y.: Frederick A. Praeger, 1962. – 152 r.

Aron R. Myr i vijna mizh nacijamy. – K.: Junivers, 2000. – 686 s.

Russet B. Economic Theories of International Politics. – Chicago: Markham Publishing Company, 1968. – 542 r.

Halperin M. Bureaucratic Politics and Foreign Policy. – Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press, 2006. – 400 r.

Allison G. Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis. – Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1971. – 338 p.

Kissinger H. The Necessity for Choice: Prospects of American Foreign Policy. – London: Chatto & Windus, New York: Harper, 1961. – 370 p.

Rosenau J. The Scientific Study of Foreign Policy. – N.Y.: Free Press, 1971. – 472 p.