Political Systems and Political Elites of the Post-Soviet States under Globalization

Main Article Content

S. Sherhin

Abstract

The article presents an analytical review of actual problems of the post-soviet states political systems within globalization in Ukraine and Russia. Special attention is paid to the consideration of
general and particular features of political elites in both countries under impact of global transformations. The variety of globalization’s exercises complicates the valuation of its impact on
social and state-political development the world over. Positive or negative influence of globalization processes particularly the global structures on world’s development is the main point of the present-day political studies. In terms of political science phenomena of globalization could be determined as a process of creation of integral global economy and institutional legalization of its integrity as well as transnational elite’s will to establish the system of global governance. Globalization accelerated the structural deformation of political elites and social differentiation that escalated socio-political conflicts and caused the stagnation of liberal democracy. In spite of some distinctions in results of transformations in Ukraine’s and Russia’s political systems the political elite that has been formed in these countries is characterized as socially heterogenic, bureaucratic, oligarchic, corruptive, populist and dependent on the global structures.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Sherhin, S. (2018) “Political Systems and Political Elites of the Post-Soviet States under Globalization”, Problems of World History, (6), pp. 9–24. doi: 10.46869/2707-6776-2018-6-1.
Section
Articles
Author Biography

S. Sherhin

Sherhin Serhii – Doctor of Political Sciences, Professor, Honored Worker of Education of Ukraine, National Academy for Public Administration under the President of Ukraine.

References

Bzhezynskyj Z. Vybor. Global'noe gospodstvo ili global'noe liderstvo. – M.: Mezhdunar. otnoshenyja, 2004. – 288 s.

Wallerstein I. Globalization or the Age of Transition? A Long-Term View of the Trajectory of the World System // International Sociology. – 2000. – Vol. 15. – No. 2. – P. 249-265.

Robinson W. A Theory of Global Capitalism: Production, Class, and State in Transitional World. – Baltimore: The Jones Hopkins University Press, 2004. – 224 p.

Gray J. False Dawn: The Delusion of Global Capitalism. – N.Y.: New Press, 1998. – 262 p.

Robertson R. Globalization: Social Theory and Global Culture. – London: Sage, 1992. – 224 p.

Sorel' Zh. Encyklopedija politychnoi' dumky. – K.: Duh i litera, 2000. – 472 s.

Polytologyja: hrestomatyja / Sost. M.A. Vasyljuk, M.S. Vershynyn. – M.: Gardaryky, 2000. – 843 s.

Bek U. Obshhestvo ryska. Na puty k drugomu modernu. – M.: Progress-Tradycyja, 2000. – 383 s.

Mysina V.A., Malynovskyj L.G. Krah yly vozrozhdenye? Rossyja y myr glazamy nauky. – M.: Algorytm, 2011. – 272 s.

Transformacyja na postsocyalystycheskom prostranstve / Otv. red. S.P. Glynkyna; sost. Y.Y. Orlyk. – SPb.: Aletejja, 2009. – 352 s.

Darendorf R. Sovremennyj socyal'nyj konflykt. Ocherk polytyky svobody. – M.: ROSSPEN, 2002. – 288 s.

Za pjat' let chyslo bednyh uvelychylos' na 7 mln. [Elektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhym dostupu: http//www.ng.ru/economics/2017-06-26/1_7015_bednost.html

Tkachenko V. Ukrai'na: quo vadis – kudy jdemo? – K.: LOGOS UKRAI'NA, 2017. – 422 s.

Stэndyng G. Trevoga prekaryata [Elektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhym dostupu: http;//www.gazeta.ru/comments/2014/12/24_a_6358273.shtml

Leont'ev M. Vnutrennyj vrag. Porazhencheskaja «elita» gubyt Rossyju. – M.: Jauza, Эksmo, 2005. – 224 s.

Golovatyj M. Komu sluzhyt' nasha elita? // Personal pljus. – 2007. – № 22. [Elektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhym dostupu: http//www.personal.plus.gov.ua

Shutov A.D. Rossyja v zhernovah ystoryy. – M.: Veche, 2008. – 512 s.

Fedorov Ju. Rossyja mezhdu fashyzmom y raspadom. – K.: TOV «Byznepolygraf», 2017. – 144 s.

Tkachenko V. Rossyja: besput'e agressora. – K.: LOGOS UKRAI'NA, 2016. – 432 s.

Karlova V. Nacional'na elita jak sub’jekt derzhavnogo tvorennja: ukrai'ns'kyj dosvid. [Elektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhym dostupu: http//www.visnyk.academy.gov.ua/wp-content/uploads/ 2013/11/2012-1-13.pdf

Piren M. Ukrai'ns'ka elita i problemy modernizacii' suspil'stva. [Elektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhym dostupu: http//www.universum.lviv.ua/magazines/universum/2000/2elita.html

Konkurentosposobnost' Ukrainy upala na try pozycyy. [Elektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhym dostupu: https://kp.ua/economics/514175-konkurentosposobnost-ukrayny-upala-na-try-pozytsyy

Ukrayna uluchshyla pokazately v myrovom rejtynge. [Elektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhym dostupu: https://ru.tsn.ua/.../ukraina-uluchshila-pokazatel-v-mirovom-reytinge-konkurentosposobnosti -chto-ne-tak-v-gosudarstve-998540.html

Gorbulin V. Gibrydna real'nist' novogo svitoustroju: neobhidnist' inshogo politychnogo bachennja // Ukrai'na dyplomatychna: Naukovyj shhorichnyk. – 2017. – Vyp. XVIII. – S. 560-571.