Deconstruction: Methodological Reflection and a Way of Rethinking Social History and Culture

Main Article Content

V. Ilyin

Abstract

The article studies deconstruction, one of the main methods of the philosophy of postmodernism. The role and place of deconstruction in the analysis of the philosophy of history and artistic works is shown. It emphasizes the positive significance of deconstruction for the development of the methodology of modern social cognition and history. It is emphasized that deconstruction is not intended to destroy axiom systems, specific for each historical period and fixed in the texts of a particular epoch, but primarily to reveal the internal contradictions of any theoretical systems. The purpose of deconstruction, according to the author, is to analyze the relations of binary positions, which causes the formation of new meanings in the knowledge of historical, social, cultural and intellectual processes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

| Abstract views: 49 | PDF Downloads: 64 |

Article Details

How to Cite
Ilyin, V. (2019) “Deconstruction: Methodological Reflection and a Way of Rethinking Social History and Culture”, Problems of World History, (7), pp. 9-19. doi: 10.46869/2707-6776-2019-7-1.

Section
Articles
Author Biography

V. Ilyin

Ilyin Volodymyr – Doctor of Philosophy, Professor, Leading Research Fellow of the State Institution “Institute of World History of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine”.

References

Lyotar Zh.-F. Sostojanye Postmoderna // Vsemyrnaja fylosofyja. HH vek. – Mn.: Harvest, 2004. – S. 466-475.

Delez Zh. Chto takoe fylosofyja? // Vsemyrnaja jencyklopedyja. Fylosofyja HH vek. – Mn.: Harvest, 2002. – S. 367-380.

Kremen' V.G., Il'i'n V.V. Filosofija: Logos, Sofija, Rozum. – K.: Knyga, 2006. – 432 s.

Makklosky D. Rytoryka jekonomycheskoj nauky. – M.; SPb.: Yzd-vo ynstytuta Gajdara, 2015. – 328 s.

Fergjuson N. Cyvylyzacyja: Chem Zapad otlychaetsja ot ostal'nogo myra. – M.: AST: CORPUS, 2014. – 544 s.

Miller J. Steven’s rock and criticisms am cure // The Georgia Review. – 1976. – № 2. – Vol. 30. – P. 330-348.

Saldivar R. Figural Language in the Novel: The flowers of speech from Cervantes to Joyce. – Princeton Legacy Library, 1984. – 284 p.

Yl'yn Y.P. Postmodernyzm: slovar' termynov. – M.: YNYON RAN. – INTRADA, 2001. – 384 s.

Weber S. Capitalising history: Notes on “The political unconscious” // The politics of theory: proceedings of the Essex Conference on the Sociology of Literature, July 1982 / Ed. by Barker F. et al. – Colchester: University of Essex, 1983. – R. 248-264.

Grabovs'kyj S. Ljudyna i svit ljudyny: versija Jevgena Sverstjuka («Sobor u ryshtuvanni») // Filosofs'ka dumka. – 2015. – № 3. – S. 105-114.

Saldivar R. Figural Language in the Novel: The flowers of speech from Cervantes to Joyce. – Princeton Legacy Library, 1984. – 284 p.

Shynkaruk V.I. Ponjattja kul'tury. Filosofs'ki aspekty // Vybrani tvory: U 3-h t. – K.: Ukrai'ns'kyj centr duhovnoi' kul'tury, 2004. – Ch. 2. – S. 209-268.

Harari Ju.N. 21 urok dlja 21 stolittja. – K.: Fors Ukrai'na, 2018. – 418 s.

Derrida J. Structure, sign, and play in the discourse of the human sciences // The structuralist controversy: The languages of criticism and the science of man. – Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1972. – P. 247-272.