Memory studies: from memory to oblivion

Main Article Content

V. Ilin

Abstract

The article examines the concept of memory studies, which is a separate discipline that studies and analyzes memory issues. The phenomenon of memory is an important part of life, although not presented as a necessary condition of mental activity. Memory, the author notes, is a way for people to construct their past through books, movies, documents, ceremonies, and so on. In memory studies, memory arises in various aspects – collective, social, cultural, genetic, and historical. The reason for claiming a worldwide "memory age" is criticism of official versions of history, the return of memory to communities and peoples whose history has been ignored, the activation of various memorial events, and more. It is shown that a social and cultural construct collective memory retains the authentic past as its version and serves as a means to achieve certain goals. Collective memory is in constant change, which is nonlinear, irrational, and not always subject to logical analysis. New events and ideas affect the perception of the past, and patterns of interpretation of the past determine the understanding of the present. The relation between collective and individual memory appears as the relation between memory and history. The primary function of historical memory is to form an identity. The development of memory studies distinguishes the political, functional, cumulative memory that use the past to shape national identity. The context of historical memory includes the concepts of "oblivion", "custom" and "tradition" that help to identify the turning points of history as they are indicators of the emergence of a new society. Historical memory is a tool for using the past to achieve goals dictated by the current situation. Mobilizing memory and collective perceptions of the past has been an integral part of the political process in recent centuries.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

| Abstract views: 91 | PDF Downloads: 100 |

Article Details

How to Cite
Ilin, V. (2020) “Memory studies: from memory to oblivion”, Problems of World History, (12), pp. 26-40. doi: 10.46869/2707-6776-2020-12-2.

Section
Articles
Author Biography

V. Ilin

Ilyin Volodymyr – Doctor of Philosophy, Professor, Professor of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv.

References

Safronova, YU.A. (2019). Istoricheskaya pamyat’: vvedeniye [Historical memory: an introduction]. – SPb.: Izd-vo Yevropeyskogo universiteta v Sankt-Peterburge. [In Russian].

Carruthers, M. (2008). The Book of Memory. A Study of Memory in Medieval Culture. – Cambridge University Press. [In English].

Yyeyts, F. (1997). Iskusstvo pamyati [The Art of Memory]. S.-Pb.: Universitetskaya kniga [In Russian].

Kansteiner, W. (2002). Finding Meaning in Memory: A Methodological Critique of Collective Memory Studies // History and Theory, 2,(XI), pp. 179-197. [In English]. https://doi.org/10.1111/0018-2656.00198

Vel’tser, KH. Istoriya, pamyat’ i sovremennost’ proshlogo. Pamyat’ kak arena politicheskoy bor’by [History, memory and the present of the past. Memory as an arena of political struggle]. [Online]. – Available from: http://magazines.russ.ru/nz/2005/2/vel3.html [In Russian].

Assman, YA. (2004). Kul’turnaya pamyat’. Pis’mo, pamyat’ o proshlom i politicheskaya identichnost’ v vysokikh kul’turakh drevnosti [Cultural memory. Writing, memory of the past and political identity in the high cultures of antiquity]. – Moskva: Yazyki slavyanskoy kul’tury [In Russian].

Nora, P. Vsemirnoye torzhestvo pamyat [World Remembrance Celebration]. [Online]. – Available from: http://magazines.russ.ru/nz/2005/2/nora22.html [In Russian].

Klein, K.L. (2000). On the Emergence of Memory in Historical Discourse // Representations, 69. Special Issue: Grounds for Remembering, pp. 127-150. [In English].

Confino, A. (1997). Collective Memory and Cultural History: Problems of Method // The American Historical Review, 5, (102), pp. 1386-1403 [In English]. https://doi.org/10.2307/2171069

Khatton, P.KH. (2003). Istoriya kak iskusstvo pamyati [History as an art of memory]. S.-Pb.: Nauka. [In Russian].

Zelizer, B. (1995). Reading the past against the Grain: The Shape of Memory Studies // Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 2, (12), pp. 214-239. [In English]. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295039509366932

Zerubavel, Y. (1986). The Recovery of Masada: A study in collective memory // The Sociological Quarterly, 2, (27), pp. 147-167. [In English]. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.1986.tb00254.x

Khal’bvaks, M. Kollektivnaya i istoricheskaya pamyat’ [Collective and Historical Memory] [Online]. – Available from: http://magazines.russ.ru/nz/2005/2/ha2.html [In Russian].

Assmann, J. (2008). Communicative and Cultural Memory. In: Erll, A. & Nünning, A. (ed). Cultural Memory Studies: An Interational and Interdisciplinary Handbook. (Pp. 109-119). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter. [In English]. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110207262

Assman, A. (2014). Dlinnaya ten’ proshlogo. Memorial’naya kul’tura i istoricheskaya politika [Long shadow of the past. Memorial culture and historical politics]. Moskva: Novoye literaturnoye obozreniye. [In Russian].

Anderson, B. (2001). Voobrazhayemyye soobshchestva. Razmyshleniya ob istokakh i rasprostranenii natsionalizma [Imaginary Communities. Reflections on the origins and spread of nationalism]. Moskva: KANON-Press-TS; Kuchkovo pole. [In Russian].

Khobsbaum, E. (2000). Izobreteniye traditsii [Invention of tradition] // Vestnik Evrazii [Eurasia Bulletin], 1, pp. 47-62. [In Russian].