Balkan in the Current European System of International Relationship

Article Sidebar

PDF (Українська)
Published: Mar 14, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.46869/2707-6776-2019-7-8
Keywords:
Albania, Macedonia, Serbia, Slovenia, Croatia, Montenegro, the USA, Russia, the Balkans, EU, NATO

Main Article Content

A. Martynov

Abstract

The historical period after the beginning of the global economic crisis has accelerated the transformation of the Balkan subsystem of the European system of international relations. In a strategic sense, the European Union faces a complex dilemma: to Europeanize the Balkans, or to risk the balkanization of Europe. The European Union, together with the United States, has overcome the scenario of European balkanization. Symbols for this were the completion of the process of joining NATO Albania, Montenegro, and Macedonia. It is critically important to overcome the conflict between Serbia and Kosovo. Russia is trying to maintain its influence in Serbia, which remains the last Russian outpost in the Balkans. Serbian society remains divided into a liberal pro-European segment focused on European and Euro-Atlantic integration, and a nationalist segment that hopes to reestablish the "Great Serbia" project on the verge of the 21st century. The peace in the Balkans can only bring the completion of the process of including this region into the system of European and Euro-Atlantic integration.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Martynov , A. (2019) “Balkan in the Current European System of International Relationship”, Problems of World History, (7), pp. 101–116. doi: 10.46869/2707-6776-2019-7-8.
Issue
No. 7 (2019): Problems of World History: Scientific Journal
Section
Articles
Author Biography

A. Martynov

Martynov Andriy – Doctor of Historical Sciences, Professor, Leading Research Fellow of Institute of History of Ukraine of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine.

References

Fukuyama Fr. State Building. Governance and World Order in the Twenty First Century. – Cornell University Press, 2004. – 340 p.

Sundhaussen H. Geschichte Serbiens. 19-21. Jahrhundert. – Wien: Böhlau Verlag, 2007. – 514 s.

Rahtfelder E. Kosovo. Geschichte eines Konflikts. – Berlin: Suhrkamp Verlag, 2010. – 400 s.

Simic Predrag. From Yugoslavia to «Euroslavia» // Review of International Affairs. – 2002. – January-March. – P. 18-21.

Gus'kova E.Ju. Ystoryja jugoslavskogo kryzysa (1990-2000). – M.: Russkoe pravo, 2001. – 720 s.

Zadohyn A.G., Nyzovskyj A.Ju. Porohovoj pogreb Evropy. Balkanskye vojny HH veka. – M.: Veche, 2000. – 416 c.

Yskenderov P.A. Ystoryja Kosovo v prycele dyskussyj // Voprosy ystoryy. – 2010. – № 3. – C. 38-54.

Ponomareva E.G. Polytycheskoe razvytye post"jugoslavskogo prostranstva (vneshnye y vnutrennye faktory). – M.: MGYMO-Unyversytet, 2007. – 236 s.

Pavlenko O. Polityka SShA shhodo problemy vyznachennja statusu Kosovo (1990-2015 roky) // Ukrai'na-Jevropa-Svit. – 2016. – № 17. – C. 127-133.

Pavlenko O. Polityka balkans'kyh krai'n shhodo vyznachennja statusu Kosovo (1990-2016 rr.) // Mizhnarodni zv’jazky Ukrai'ny: naukovi poshuky i znahidky. – 2016. – Vyp. 25. – C. 295-306.

Pavlenko O. Polityka Rosijs'koi' Federacii' shhodo problemy Kosovo (1991-2015 rr.) // Eminak. Naukovyj shhokvartal'nyk. – 2016. – № 1 (13). – S. 105-112. [Elektronnyj resers]. – Rezhym dostupu: www.eminak.mksat.net/pages/archive.html

Pavlenko O. Problema statusu Kosovo v polityci Jevropejs'kogo sojuzu (1998-2016) // Shidnojevropejs'kyj istorychnyj visnyk. – 2017. – Vyp. 3. – S. 107-113. [Elektronnyj resers]. – Rezhym dostupu: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/eehb_2017_3_16

Profil. – 2018. – № 8. – S. 19-20.

Neue Zürcher Zeitung. – 2018. – 23 Februar. – S. 20.

Neue Zürcher Zeitung. – 2018. – 30 September. – S. 13.