Historical Memory in the Process of Formation and Reproduction of Modern National Identity: the French Experience (Part 2)

Main Article Content


The article is devoted to the study of the role of historical tradition and national memory in the formation of modern types of ethno-national identity and mechanisms of consolidation of citizens at the stage of formation of the French state of the modern type. In this regard, various versions of French history were analyzed by representatives of historical and historiographical schools, which still compete with each other for the status of creators of a generally accepted interpretation of important historical events.

It was found that consistently patriotic motivation, which ensures the formation and realization of the innovative potential of the people and social activity of this creative core of the nation, aimed at overcoming any crisis challenges, is formed only on the basis of maximum meaningful synthesis of existing interpretations of French history. In particular, the effectiveness of memory policy is ensured by the fact that symbols, traditions and historical monuments that positively influence the dynamics of national-patriotic motivations and feelings are inevitably (and often, quite consciously) filled with qualitatively new meanings and values.

The complete failure of neoliberal and left-wing radical critiques of Holism’s theory and practice has been proved, the conservative elements of which, in particular the appeal to the heroic past, are not at all identical with medieval archaism and almost neo-Nazi political preferences. On the contrary, the typological similarity of Bonapartism and Hollism is due precisely to their ability to effectively oppose reactionary and revolutionary extremism, which is equally destructive to the nation-state.

In this regard, the exceptional relevance of the use of historical memory to form their own traditionalist and authoritarian charisma (in their relationship) by the creator and first president of the Fifth Republic Charles de Gaulle in the process of his opposition to anti-national provocations of far-right and far-left.


Download data is not yet available.

| Abstract views: 71 | PDF Downloads: 41 |

Article Details

How to Cite
Shmorgun, O. (2021) “Historical Memory in the Process of Formation and Reproduction of Modern National Identity: the French Experience (Part 2)”, Problems of World History, (16), pp. 7-53. doi: 10.46869/2707-6776-2021-16-1.

Author Biography

O. Shmorgun

Shmorgun Oleksandr – Ph.D. in Philosophy, Associate Professor, Leading Research Fellow of the State Institution “Institute of World History of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine”.


Shmorhun, O. (2011). Elitarnyy vymir demokratiyi: problema avtorytarnoho liderstva [The elitist dimension of democracy: the problem of authoritarian leadership]. Elita: vytoky, sutnist’, perspektyva [Elite: origins, essence, perspective]. Kyiv: T-vo “Znannya” Ukrayiny, pp. 343-414. [In Ukrainian].

Shmorhun, O. (2016). Typolohichni kharakterystyky modernizatsiynoyi modeli vlady [Typological characteristics of the modernization model of power]. Modernizatsiya i bezpeka rozvytku v umovakh hlobalizatsiyi. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats’ [Modernization and security of development in the context of globalization. Collection of scientific works]. Kyiv: DU “Instytut vsesvitn’oyi istoriyi NAN Ukrayiny”, pp. 167-179. [In Ukrainian].

Goll’, Sh. de. (2006). Na ostriye shpagi [On the edge of the sword]. Moskva: Izdatel’stvo “Yevropa”. [In Russian].

Vernan, ZH.-P. (1988). Proiskhozhdeniye drevnegrecheskoy mysli [The origin of ancient Greek thought]. Moskva: Progress. [In Russian].

Shmitt, K. (2010). Gosudarstvo i politicheskaya forma [State and political form]. Moskva: Izd. dom GU-VSHE. [In Russian].

Shmitt, K. (2008). Nomos Zemli v prave narodov jus publicum europaeum [Nomos of the Earth in the law of peoples jus publicum europaeum]. SPb.: Vladimir dal’. [In Russian].

Mestr, ZH.-M. de. (1997). Rassuzhdeniya o Frantsii [Reasoning about France]. Moskva: “Rossiyskaya politicheskaya entsiklopediya” (ROSSPEN). [In Russian].

Bergson, A. (1994). Dva istochnika morali i religii [Two sources of morality and religion]. Moskva: Kanon. [In Russian].

Shmorhun, O. (2008). Innovatsiyna stratehiya pobudovy politychnoyi vlady v Ukrayini [Innovative strategy for building political power in Ukraine]. Fenomen innovatsiyi: osvita, suspil’stvo, kul’tura [The phenomenon of innovation: education, society, culture]. Kyiv: Pedahohichna dumka, pp. 305-417. [In Ukrainian].

Istoryzm Zhyulya Mishle [Historicism of Jules Michelet]. [Online]. Available from: http://roii.ru/publications/dialogue/article/72_4/gordon_a.v./historicism-of-jules-michelet [In Ukrainian].

Khakimov, G. “Vremya bol’shoy dlitel’nosti” F. Brodelya kak metodologicheskiy printsip sotsial’no-gumanitarnogo poznaniya [“Time of great duration” F. Braudel as a methodological principle of social and humanitarian knowledge.] ]. [Online]. Available from: http://vphil.ru/index.php?option=com_task=& id=&Itemid=52 [In Russian].

Blok, M. (1986). Apologiya istorii, ili remeslo istorika [Apology of history, or the craft of a historian]. Moskva: Nauka. [In Russian].

Zhores, Zh. Idealizm v istorii [Idealism in history]. [Online]. Available from: https://www.sensusnovus.ru/idea/2013/01/26/15604.html [In Russian].

Lefebvre, G. (1978). Réflexions sur l’histoire. Paris: François Maspero. [In French].

Blok, M. Feodal’ne suspil’stvo. Knyha druha [Feudal society. Book two]. [Online]. Available from: http://litopys.org.ua/bloch/blo08.htm [In Ukrainian].

Boden, Zh. (2000). Metod logkogo poznaniya istorii [Method of easy cognition of history]. Moskva: Nauka. [In Russian].

Bodin, J. (1583). Les six livres de la République. Рaris. [Online]. Available from: http://classiques.uqac.ca/classiques/bodin_jean/six_livres_republique/bodin_six_livres_republique.pdf [In French].

Shmorhun, O. Dosyahnennya natsional’noyi yednosti: frantsuz’ka model’ [Achieving national unity: the French model]. [Online]. Available from: http://hvylya.net/analytics/history/ dosyagnennya-natsionalnoyi-yednosti-frantsuzka-model.html [In Ukrainian].

Obychai i traditsii Frantsii. [Customs and traditions of France]. [Online]. Available from: https://guide.travel.ru/france/people/traditions/ [In Russian].

Zhiskar, d’Esten V. (1990). Vlast’ i zhizn’ [Power and life]. Moskva: Mezhdunarodnyye otnosheniya. [In Russian].

Mestr, Zh. de. (2007). Sochineniya. Chetyre neizdannyye glavy o Rossii. Pis’ma russkomu dvoryaninu ob ispanskoy inkvizitsii [Compositions. Four unpublished chapters on Russia. Letters to a Russian nobleman about the Spanish Inquisition]. SPb.: “Vladimir Dal’”. [In Russian].

Furet, F. (1978). Penser la Révolution française. Paris: Gallimard. [In French].

Kurlanski, M. (2008). 1968. God, potryas mir [1968. Year, shook the world]. Moskva: AST: AST MOSKVA; Vladimir: VKT. [In Russian].

(2010). Vynaydennya tradytsiyi [Invention of tradition]. Kyiv: Nika-Tsentr. [In Ukrainian].

Delpard, R. (2008). La Fabuleuse Histoire du drapeau français. Saint-Paul: éd. L. Souny. [In French].

Dansette, A. (1976). Le Second Empire. Naissance de la France moderne. Paris: Hachette. [In French].

Desternes, S. Chandey, H. (1961). Napoléon III, homme du XX siecle. Paris: Hachette. [In French].

Smirnov, A. (2003). Imperiya Napoleona III [The Empire of Napoleon III]. Moskva: Eksmo. [In Russian].

Cherkasov, P. (2012). Napoleon III – imperator frantsuzov [Napoleon III – Emperor of the French]. Novaya i noveyshaya istoriya [Modern and Contemporary history], 3, pp. 197-216. [In Russian].

Housset, G. La part de l’idéologie dans les campagnes de la Révolution et de l’Empire ou qu’est-ce qui pousse les soldat à aller au combat ? Revue militaire générale, 56, pp. 1-8. [Online]. Available from: https://www.penseemiliterre.fr/la-part-de-l-ideologie-dans-les-campagnes-de-la-revolution-et-de-l-empire-ou-qu-est-ce-qui-pousse-le-soldat-a-aller-au-combat-_114471_1013077.html [In French].

Shmorhun, O. (2020). Krakh tradytsiynoyi partiynoyi systemy u Frantsiyi ta politychne protystoyannya na pochatku XXI stolittya [The collapse of the traditional party system in France and the political confrontation at the beginning of the XXI century]. Suspil’no-politychni protsesy [Socio-political processes], 2, (16), pp. 219-275. [In Ukrainian].

Kola, D. (2001). Politicheskaya sotsiologiya [Political Sociology]. Moskva: Ves’ mir; INFRA-M. [In Russian].

Malraux, A. Discours prononcé à l’Institut Charles-de-Gaulle le 23 novembre 1975 pour le cinquième anniversaire de la mort du général de Gaulle. [Online]. Available from: https://www.assemblee-nationale.fr/histoire/Andre-Malraux/discours_politique_culture/mort_ de_gaulle.asp?fbclid=IwAR1kKddIv9Np3uTctF6NoPrOf_eaeCxx9gxzKp-Qdx6YJ9xj23c8TAiBZa4 [In French].

Discours de Bayeux, 16 juin 1946. Présidant les fêtes organisées par la municipalité de Bayeux en commémoration de la libération de la cité et de sa visite en 1944, le général de Gaulle prononce un discours dans lequel il présente ses vues en matière constitutionnelle. [Online]. Available from: https://www.charles-de-gaulle.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/Discours-de-Bayeux-16-juin-1946.pdf [In French].

Agulhon, M. (1979). Marianne au combat. L’imagerie et la symbolique républicaines de 1789 à 1880. Paris: Flammarion. [In French].

Khatton, P. (2004). Istoriya kak iskusstvo pamyati [History as the art of memory]. SPb.: Izdatel’stvo Vladimir Dal’. [In Russian].

Nora, P. (2014). Teperishnye, natsiya, pam”yat’ [Present, nation, memory]. Kyiv: TOV “Vydavnytstvo “Klio”. [In Ukrainian].

Shmorhun, O. (2016). Moderni etnonatsional’ni protsesy: potentsial antykryzovoho rozvytku Ukrayiny [Modern ethno-national processes: the potential of anti-crisis development of Ukraine]. Problemy vsesvitn’oyi istoriyi: naukovyy zhurnal [Problems of world history: a scientific journal], 2, pp. 30-49. [In Ukrainian].

Renan, E. Shcho take natsiya? [What is a nation?]. [Online]. Available from: https://zbruc.eu/node/59455 [In Ukrainian].

Pegi, Sh. (2001). Nasha yunost’. Misteriya o miloserdii Zh. d’Ark [Our youth. The Mystery of Mercy J. D’Arc]. Moskva: Nauka. [In Russian].

De Saint-Exuperi, A. (1972). Oeuvre. Moscou: Editions du progres. [In French].

Goll’, Sh. de. (2000). Memuary nadezhd [Memoirs of Hopes]. Moskva: Progress. [In Russian].

Landau, A. (2016). De Goll’ [De Gaulle]. Moskva: Entsiklopediya-ru. [In Russian].

Gonsales-Mata, L. (1983). Nevidimyye vlastiteli: Zapiski agenta [Invisible rulers: Notes of an agent]. Moskva: Progress. [In Russian].

U Frantsiyi oblyly farboyu byust de Hollya [In France, painted a bust of de Gaulle]. [Online]. Available from: https://ua.korrespondent.net/world/4241084-u-frantsii-oblyly-farboui-buist-de-hollia [In Ukrainian].

(2007). Frantsiya. V poiskakh novykh putey [France. Looking for new ways]. Moskva: Izdatel’stvo “Ves’ mir”. [In Russian].

Touraine, A. (1992). Critique of Modernity. Paris: Fayard. [In French].

Shmorhun, O. Demohrafichna katastrofa yak chynnyk hlobal’noyi voyennoyi zahrozy. Chastyna 1 [Demographic catastrophe as a factor in the global military threat. Part 1]. Informatsiyno-analitychna hazeta “Kontrast” [Information and analytical newspaper “Contrast”]. [Online]. Available from: https://www.kontrast.org.ua/news/2592.html [In Ukrainian].

Shmorhun, O. Demohrafichna katastrofa yak chynnyk hlobal’noyi voyennoyi zahrozy. Chastyna 1 [Demographic catastrophe as a factor in the global military threat. Part 2]. Informatsiyno-analitychna hazeta “Kontrast” [Information and analytical newspaper “Contrast”]. [Online]. Available from: http://www.kontrast.org.ua/news/ 2591.html [In Ukrainian].

Mal’ro, A. (1989). Zerkalo limba: Sbornik [Limb mirror: Collection]. Moskva: Progress. [In Russian].