Theoretical and Methodological Aspects of Regionalism: Problems of Interaction of Border Regions

Main Article Content

Abstract

The scientific literature presents various definitions of the concepts of ‘regionalism’, ‘regionalization’ and ‘interregional interaction’. The processes associated with globalization and integration manifest themselves in the form of consolidation of macro-regional ties. The formation of big macroeconomic zones of priority cooperation covers neighbouring and geographically close countries. The consolidation of large economic spaces is accompanied by the creation of regional economic organizations and integration communities aimed at deepening trade, economic cooperation and regional division of labour.


In parallel with the formation of large economic and political regional associations at the macro level, globalization has accelerated the process of diversification of territorial administration functions within individual states. The redistribution of power within individual countries is seen as a parallel process of regionalization at the grassroots level. The signs of regionalism at the micro level include the increasing role of subnational territorial communities, the growth of their interest in establishing closer cooperation with the border territories of neighboring countries.


In the most general sense, the author considers regionalism as a dynamic feature of international political and economic processes, indicated by the diversification of management functions at different levels of socio-political organization. The methodology of political science distinguishes the manifestations of regionalisms at the macro and micro levels. Various manifestations of regionalism are embodied in the design of large economic spaces, the redistribution of power within individual countries, increasing the level of regional self-government, development of interregional contacts and interregional integration ties between neighbouring and/or geographically close countries.


The practice of interregional cooperation is most successfully applied within the framework of multilateral integration associations, primarily in the EU and in the wider European space covered by the scope of European conventions and decisions in the field of spatial cooperation of territorial communities and authorities, including local and regional self-government. Interaction between subnational regions includes the conclusion of agreements between territorial communities of neighbouring countries, the creation of interregional associations and contractual networks of interregional cooperation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

| Abstract views: 58 | PDF Downloads: 51 |

Article Details

How to Cite
Tolstov, S. (2022) “Theoretical and Methodological Aspects of Regionalism: Problems of Interaction of Border Regions”, Problems of World History, (17), pp. 7-41. doi: 10.46869/2707-6776-2022-17-1.

Section
Articles
Author Biography

S. Tolstov

Tolstov Sergiy – Ph.D. in History, Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Transatlantic Research of the State Institution “Institute of World History of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine”.

References

First global report by United Cities and Local Governments (2008). Decentralization and local democracy in the world. Barcelona : United Cities and Local Governments (UCLG); The World Bank. [In English].

Ahranoff, R. (1997). Ohlyad yevropeysʹkykh tradytsiy mistsevoho samovryaduvannya. Mistseve samovryaduvannya v Ukrayini: problemy i prohnozy. Kyiv : Institut sotsiologiyi NAN Ukrayiny, P. 3-24. [In English].

Brennan, L., Murray, P. (eds.). (2015). Drivers of Integration and Regionalism in Europe and Asia : Comparative perspectives. London, New York : Routledge; Taylor & Francis Group. [In English].

Duchacek, I. (1990). Perforated Sovereignities: Towards a new actors international relations. Soldatos, P. (ed.). An explanatory Framework for the study federated states as foreign Policy actors. Oxford: Oxford University Press. P. 1-53. [In English].

Husson, B., Soukouna, S. (2017). Stratégies internationales des collectivités territoriales. Revue internationale des études du développement. 2017. No 4 (232). Paris : Ed Sorbonne. [In French].

Scully, R., Jones, R.W. (2010). Europe, Regions and European Regionalism. Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics. London : Palgrave Macmillan. [In English].

Stoker, G. (2006). Comparative local governance. Rhodes, R.A.W., Binder, S.A., & Rockman, B.A. (eds.). The Oxford handbook of political institutions. New York : Oxford University Press. P. 495-513. [In English].

Keating, M. (1998). The New Regionalism in Western Europe. Territorial Restructuring and Political Change. Cheltenham : Edward Elgar. [In English].

Keating, M. (2003). Novyy rehyonalyzm v Zapadnoy Evrope; per. s angl. Logos. No 6 (40). P. 67-116. [In Russian].

Symon, M. (2007). Vozdeystvye protsessov rehyonalyzatsyy na natsyonal’nye hosudarstva Evropy. Vlast’. No 11. P. 109-113. [In Russian].

Storper, M. (1995). The Resurgence of Regional Economies, Ten Years Later: The Region as a Nexus of Untraded Interdependencies. European Urban and Regional Studies. 2 (3). P. 191-221. [In English].

Hettne, B. (2005). Beyond the ‘new’ regionalism. New Political Economy. 10 (4). P. 543-571. [In English].

Hurrell, A. (1995). Regionalism in Theoretical Perspective. Fawcett, L., Hurrell, A. (eds.). Regionalism in World Politics: Regional Organizations and International Order. Oxford : Oxford University Press. P. 37-73. [In English].

Altermatt, U. (2000). Étnonatsyonalyzm v Evrope. Moscow : RHHU. [In Russian].

Anderson, B. (2016). Voobrazhaemye soobshchestva. Razmyshlenyya ob ystokakh y rasprostranenyy natsyonalyzma; per. s angl. V. Nykolaeva. Moskva : Kuchkovo pole. [In Russian].

Prazauskas, A.A. (1997). Étnonatsyonalyzm, mnohonatsyonalʹnoe hosudarstvo y protsessy hlobalyzatsyy. Polys. Polytycheskye yssledovanyya. 2. P. 95-105. [In Russian].

Busygina, Y.M. (1993). Nastoyashchee y budushchee “Evropy rehyonov” (problemy evropeyskoho rehyonalyzma). Myrovaya ékonomyka y mezhdunarodnye otnoshenyya. 9. P. 78-86. [In Russian].

Busygina, Y.M. (1998). Rehyonalʹnaya polytyka Evropeyskoho Soyuza na rubezhe vekov: novye tendentsyy y vyzovy. Evropa na porohe KHKHI veka: Renessans yly upadok? Moscow: INION RAN. P. 110-118. [In Russian].

Trofymova, Y.N. (2011). Detsentralyzatsyya hosudarstvennoho upravlenyya y osobennosty tsentr-lokal’nykh otnoshenyy v evropeyskykh stranakh. Sravnytel’naya polytyka. 4. P. 35-44. [In Russian].

Budzins’kyy, T.V. (1999). Regional’ni tendentsiyi v krayinakh Yevropeys’koyi Spil’noty (1945-1992). Nova polityka. 3. P. 8-14. [In Russian].

Vermenych, Y.V. (2021). Kordony ta pohranychchya v dyskursyvnomu prostori sotsiohumanitarystyky: teoretychni proektsiyi. Visnyk Natsional’noyi akademiyi nauk Ukrayiny. 7. P. 55-70. [In Ukrainian].

Vidnyans’kyy, S., Vovkanych, I. (2018). Istoriohrafichni aspekty transkordonnoho spivrobitnytstva Ukrayiny. Heopolityka ukrayiny: istoriya i suchasnist’: Zb. nauk. Prats’. 2 (21). P. 7-41. [In Ukranian].

Hoblyk, V.V. (2015). Rehional’na polityka Yevropeys’koho Soyuzu v konteksti rozvytku transkordonnykh rehioniv. Agrosvit. 3-4. P. 21-25. [In Ukranian].

Derhachev, V.A. (2014). Novye formy mezhdunarodnoy ékonomycheskoy rehyonalyzatsyy. Ekonomichni innovatsiyi. 57. P.111-126. [In Russian].

Kyrydon, A.M. (2015). Yevropeys’ka identychnist’: strukturuvannya smyslovoho prostoru. Yevropeys’ki istorychni studiyi. 2. S. 26-53. [Online] Available from: http://eustudies.history.knu.ua/nomer-2/ [In Ukranian].

Konstantynov, V. (2012). Evolyutsiya naukovykh pidkhodiv do doslidzhennya fenomenu rehionalizmu v mizhnarodnykh vidnosynakh. Visnyk Kyyivs’koho natsional’noho universytetu im. T. Shevchenka. Mizhnarodni vidnosyny. 38-39. P. 20-22. [In Ukranian].

Kruhlashov, A. (2003). Vid “Yevropy natsiy” do “Yevropy regioniv”. Polityka i chas. 10. P. 69-78. [In Ukranian].

Semynozhenko, V.P., Danylyshyn, B.M. (2005). Novyy regionalizm. Kyiv: Nauk. dumka. [In Ukranian].

Tul’chynsʹkyy, R.V. (2018). Klasyfikatsiyni oznaky novoho rehionalizmu. Visnyk Cherkas’koho universytetu. Seriya “Ekonomichni nauky”, 2. P. 11-16. [In Ukranian].

Thoenig, J.-C. (2006). Territorial Institutions. Rhodes, R.A.W., Binder, S.A. & Rockman, B.A. (eds). The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions. New York : Oxford University Press. P. 281-302. [In English].

Van der Velde, B.M.R. Labour market in a border-area. Searching for jobs and the influence of borders. Paper prepared for the 38th European Congress of the European Regional Science Association. Vienna, Austria, August 28 – September 1, 1998. 15 p. [Online]. Available from: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/113439/1/ ERSA1998_104.pdf [In English].

Council of Europe (1980). European Outline Convention on Transfrontier Co-operation between Territorial Communities or Authorities. Madrid, 21.05.1980. [Online]. Available from: https://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/0900001680078b0c [In English].

Mission Opérationnelle Transfrontalière (2015). Cross-border economic development. Practical guide. Building partnerships. Promoting projects. Paris : Mission Opérationnelle Transfrontalière. [In French].

Council of Europe. Sovet Evropy_Globalisation. [Online]. Available from: https://www.coe.int/ru/web/compass/globalisation [In Russian].

Busygina, Y.M. (2006). Polytycheskaya rehyonalystyka. Moscow: ROSSPÉN. [In Russian].

Kuznetsov, A.V., Kuznetsova, O.V. (eds). (2015). Regyonal’naya polytyka: zarubezhnyy opyt y rossyyskye realyi. Moscow: IMEMO RAN. [In Russian].

Staab, A. (2011). The European Union explained. Institutions, actors, global impact. 2nd ed. Bloomington, Indianapolis : Indiana University Press. [In English].

Antonyuk, N.V., Mykiyevych, M.M. (2005). Yevropeys’kyy Soyuz: polityka, ekonomika, pravo. L’viv: Lvivs`kyi natsional’nyi universitet. [In Ukranian].

European Commission (2009). European Regional Policy, an inspiration for Countries outside the EU? Applying the principles, sharing the lessons, exchanging experience. Luxembourg : Directorate-General for Regional Policy; Office of the official publications of the European Union. DOI: 10.2776/11830 [In English].

Kushnir, V.H. (2021). Ukrayintsi porubizhzhya lisostepu i stepu. Metodychni rekomendatsiyi. Odesa: ONU. [In Ukranian].

Malynovs’ka, O.Y. (2001). Derzhavni kordony yak liniyi rozmezhuvannya i ob’yednannya. Ekonomichna ta sotsial’na heohrafiya: nauk. zbirnyk. 51. P. 153-157. [In Ukranian].

Maloe pryhranychnoe dvyzhenye. Migrant.info.pl. [Online]. Available from: https://www.migrant.info.pl/Малое_приграничное_движение.html [In Russian].

Commission of the European Communities (2004). European Neighbourhood Policy – Strategy Paper / Communication from the Commission [COM(2004) 373 final]. Brussels, 12.5.2004. [In English].

MID RF (2021). Vneshnepolytycheskaya y dyplomatycheskaya deyatel’nost’ Rossyyskoy Federatsyy v 2020 hodu. Obzor MYD Rossyy. Moscow. [In Russian].

Rossiyskaya gazeta (2019). Kytay otkryl zonu svobodnoy torhovly, oryentyrovannuyu na Rossyyu. Aug 30. [Online] Available from: https://rg.ru/2019/08/30/kitaj-otkryl-zonu-svobodnoj-torgovli-orientirovannuiu-na-rossiiu.html [In Russian].

CAREC (2020). Usylenye transgranychnogo sotrudnychestva soobshchestv v rehyone CAREC. Obzornoe yssledovanye. Manila : Asian development bank. [In Russian].

Abdullaev, Y. et al. (2009). Gruppy vodopol’zovateley v Tsentral’noy Azyy: novaya forma kollektyvnykh deystvyy v upravlenyy orosytel’noy vodoy. Upravlenye vodnymy resursamy. 5 (24). P. 1029-1043. [In Russian].

Kyrydon, A. (2015). Yevropeys’ka identychnist’: kosmopolitychna kontseptsiya Ul’rikha Beka. Zovnishni spravy. 9. P. 52-55. [In Ukrainian].

Bourdieu, P. (2002). Ydentychnost’ y reprezentatsyya: élementy krytycheskoy refleksy ydey “rehyona”. Ab Imperio. 3. P. 45-60. [In Russian].

Crepaz, K. (2016). “Europe of the Regions”: An Approach to Counter Separatist Tendencies? L’Europe en Formation. 1 (379). P. 24-39. [In English].

Bogatyreva, O.N. Evropeyskye modely regyonalyzma. Ekaterynburh : Izdayelstvo Ural’skogo universiteta. [In Russian].

Council of Europe (2000). Guiding Principles for Sustainable Spatial Development of the European Continent. European Conference of Ministers responsible for Regional Planning (CEMAT). [Hanover, 7-8 September 2000]. [Online] Available from: https://rm.coe.int/1680700173 [In English]

Tolstov, S. (2019). Separatism and secessionism: conceptual features in the context of European integration project. Ideology and politics. 1 (12). P. 73-95. [Online] Available from: https://www.ideopol.org/wp-content/uploads/ 2019/11/___ENG.%201.4.%20Tolstov%20FIN.pdf [In Ukrainian].