Historical Retrospective of the Phenomenon of Populism and Political Demagogy

Main Article Content

Abstract

The article gives a general description of the phenomenon of populism and political demagoguery through the prism of their historical development. The author pays special attention to the disclosure of the essence of the concepts of “populism” and “political demagoguery”, while defining their common features and differences. In particular, it is noted that despite their outward resemblance, populism and demagoguery are not identical. Thus, populism provides a much less negative way of gaining popularity among the masses than demagoguery, because demagogues speculate on the real problems of their audience, present events, views of the opponent in a false light, resort to falsification of facts. In modern political practice, populism is a much more complex and ambiguous phenomenon, and demagoguery is only one of its many tools and strategies. In this aspect, the concept of “politicking” is close in meaning, which, along with demagoguery, is one of the negative manifestations of populism.


The article also makes one of the first attempts to identify the main periods of historical development of populism and political demagoguery, while determining the main directions of their evolution. At the same time, examining populism and political demagoguery in historical retrospect, we can also conclude that the objective conditions for the emergence of these socio-political phenomena were related to the social trend, according to which the masses are only the object of politics. Subjective preconditions for the emergence and spread of populism are caused by the imperfection of the relationship “domination – subordination”, the dominance of mass society. In general, the study concludes that the functioning and prevalence of populism and political demagoguery in modern political systems is characterized by its determinism of cultural, historical, political characteristics of countries.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Tsapko, O. (2021) “Historical Retrospective of the Phenomenon of Populism and Political Demagogy”, Problems of World History, (13), pp. 10–23. doi: 10.46869/2707-6776-2021-13-1.
Section
Articles
Author Biography

O. Tsapko

Tsapko Oleh – Ph.D. in History, Associate Professor, Leading Research Fellow of the State Institution “Institute of World History of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine”.

References

Tartar, A. (2017). Right Is Redrawing the Map of Europe. December 11. [Online]. Avaliable from: https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2017-europe-populist-right/ [In English].

Volkova, I.V. (1992). Populizm i konservatizm: k istorii amerikanskoy politicheskoy mysli kontsa XIX veka [Populism and Conservatism: Toward a History of American Political Thought in the Late 19th Century]. Moskva. [In Russian].

Aver’yanov, Yu.I. (ed) (1993). Politologiya: Entsiklopedicheskiy slovar’ [Political Science: Encyclopedic Dictionary]. Moskva: Izd-vo Mosk. kommerch. un-ta. [In Russian].

Grigoryan, R.G. & Demin, G.I. (1995). Politologicheskiy slovar’: Uchebnoye posobiye [Political Science Dictionary: Textbook]. Moskva: Vysshaya shkola. [In Russian].

Mudde, C. (2004). The Populist Zeitgeist. Government and Opposition, 4, (39), pp. 542-563. [In English]. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00135.x

Schmitter, Ph.C. (2006). A Balance Sheet of the Vices and Virtues of ‘Populisms’. Raper presented at the conference “The Challenges of the New Populism” (pp. 2-19). Bulgaria, Sofia: The Center for Liberal Strategies. [In English].

Kitschelt, H. (2002). Popular Dissatisfaction with Democracy: Populism and Party Systems. In Y. Mény & Y. Surel (eds.) Democracies and the Populist Challenge (pp. 179-196). Basingstoke, New York: Palgrave. [In English]. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403920072_10

Dal’, V.I. (1955). Tolkovyy slovar’ zhivogo velikorusskogo yazyka. 1 tom [Explanatory Dictionary of the Living Great Russian Language. Volume 1]. Moskva: Gosud. izd-vo inostrannykh i national’nykh slovarey. [In Russian].

Shansky, N.M. & Bobrova, T.A. (1994). Etimologicheskiy slovar’ russkogo yazyka [Etymological dictionary of the Russian language]. Moskva: Proserpina. [In Russian].

Baranov, N.A. (2005). Populizm i demagogiya [Populism and demagoguery]. In N.V. Dulina & I.A. Nebykov (eds). Chelovek, kul’tura, obshchestvo: mezhvuz. sb. nauch. tr., 3 [Man, culture, society: interuniversity. Sat. scientific. tr.] (pp. 100-108). Volgograd. [In Russian].

Koryavin, L. (1991). Populizm v SSHA [Populism in the USA]. Moskva. [In Russian].

Mair, P. (2002). Populist Democracy v.s. Party Democracy. In Y. Mény & Y. Surel (eds.) Democracies and the Populist Challenge (pp. 81-97). Basingstoke, New York: Palgrave. [In English]. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403920072_5

Dem’yanenko, M. (2015). Populizm yak politychnyy fenomen i manipulyatyvna tekhnolohiya. Dys. na zdob. n.s. kand. polit. nauk. [Populism as a political phenomenon and manipulative technology. Dis. at health researcher Candidate of Political Science]. Kyiv. [In Ukrainian].

Ignazi, P. (2002). The Extreme Right: Defining the Object and Assessing the Causes. In M. Schain, A. Zolberg & P. Hossay (eds). Shadows over Europe: The Development and Impact of the Extreme Right in Western Europe (pp. 17-35). New York: Palgrave Macmillan. [In English]. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230109186_1

Kraus, S. & Davis, D. (1976). The Effects of Mass Communication on Political Behavior. Pensylvania State University Press. [In English].

Crozier, M. & Friedberg, E. (1980). Actors and Systems. The Politics of Collective Action. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [In English]. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/61.1.328

Taggart, P. (2002). Populism and the Pathology of Representative Politics. In Y. Mény & Y. Surel (eds.) Democracies and the Populist Challenge (pp. 62-80). Basingstoke, New York: Palgrave. [In English]. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403920072_4

Ivanyan, E. (1975). Belyy dom: politika i prezidenty [White House: Politics and Presidents]. Moskva : Izd-vo polit. lit. [In Russian].

Romanyuk, A. (2007). Porivnyal’nyy analiz politychnykh instytutiv krayin Zakhidnoyi Yevropy [Comparative analysis of political institutions in Western Europe]. L’viv: Vyd. tsentr LNU im. I. Franka. [In Ukrainian]. [In Ukrainian].

Pogorelskaya, S.V. (2004). “Vechno vcherashniye”: pravyy populizm i pravyy radikalizm v Zapadnoy Yevrope [“Forever Yesterday”: Right-wing Populism and Right-Wing Radicalism in Western Europe]. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnyye otnosheniya [World Economy and International Relations], 3, pp. 14-23. [In Russian]. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203381632-8

Valitskiy, A. (1999). Marksyzm i strybok u tsarstvo svobody. Istoriya komunistychnoyi utopiyi [Marxism and the leap into the realm of freedom. History of Communist Utopia]. Kyiv: Vsesvit. [In Ukrainian].

Gorbatenko, V. (2006). Desyat’ urokiv politychnoho liderstva dlya postradyans’kykh kermanychiv [Ten lessons of political leadership for post-Soviet leaders]. Politychnyy menedzhment. Spetsvypusk [Political management. Special edition], pp. 48-63. [In Ukrainian].

Obshchestvennoye mneniye i vlast’: mekhanizmy vozdeystviya, (1993). [Public opinion and power: mechanisms of influence]. Кiev. [In Russian].