Main Article Content
The article comprehensively examines the main components of the Turkmen model of development. In particular, it is noted that today Turkmenistan, compared to other post-Soviet countries, has hardly been affected by modern processes of reforming public life and economic sphere on the basis of democracy, rule of law, building a civilized market and a full-fledged civil society. The author of the article gives a detailed description of modern informal clan structures in Turkmenistan, clarifies their nature and the degree of influence on the functioning of the state and legal system of the country. In particular, it is concluded that the decisive role in the formation of the peculiarities of the Turkmen model of development was played by clan - tribal groups, which have developed here historically. The dominant role among them in public authorities today is occupied by Akhal Tekins.The period of formation of the Turkmen model of development was conditionally divided into two stages. The first stage covers the chronological framework from 1991 to 2006; it is connected with the rule of the first president of the country S. Niyazov. Characteristic features of this period were that proclaimed in the Constitution of Turkmenistan, the construction of a democratic society was replaced by the transition to a “national classless society of a fundamentally new type” at the center of which is the president with unlimited power and cult of personality. The second stage concerns the beginning of 2007 and to the present day. It is connected with the rule of G. Berdymukhamedov. Despite some attempts to democratize the existing systems of government, the activities of the new leader, as well as his predecessor, is characterized by the secrecy and family-clan nature of the ruling elite.A significant place in the article is also given to the study of the peculiarities of economic development of the country, in particular in the field of investment activities. In addition, the main factors influencing the evolution of modern Turkmen foreign policy from a policy of neutrality to isolationism are identified. The author of the article also notes the existence in the modern political system of Turkmenistan of a kind of institutional-legal vacuum, which ultimately leads to the formation of a cult of personality in the country. All this has become a significant obstacle to the process of forming a modern institutional structure in the country.
Kozhukhar, O. (2013). Evolyutsiya polityky Kytayu v Tsentral’niy Aziyi (90 - rr. ХХ st. – poch. ХХІ st.) [Evolution of Chinese policy in Central Asia (90s of the XX century – beginning of the XXI century)]. Zbirnyk neukovykh prats’ Kharkivs’koho natsional’noho pedahohichnoho universytetu imeni H.S. Skovorody “Istoriya ta heohrafiya” [Collection of non-scientific works of Kharkiv National Pedagogical University named after G.S. Skovoroda “History and Geography”], 47, pp. 107-112. [Online]. Available from: http://www.nbuv.gov:ua/UJRN/ zupkhupu_ist_2013_47_23 [In Ukrainian].
Metel’ova, T.O. (2016). Turkmenistan: osoblyvyy shlyakh chy nevidpovidnist’ [Turkmenistan: a special way or neo-despotism]. Krayiny postrazhdaloho prostoru v umovakh formuvannya bahatopolyusnoho svitu: istorychni uroky ta perspektyvy. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats’ [Countries of the post-Soviet space in the conditions of formation of the multipolar world: historical lessons and prospects]. DU “Instytut vsesvitn’oyi istoriyi NAN Ukrayiny”. [Countries of the post-Soviet space in the conditions of formation of the multipolar world: historical lessons and prospects. Collection of scientific works. State Institution “Institute of World History of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine”]. Kyiv, pp. 164-178. [In Ukrainian].
Lyashenko, T.(2013). Vektory politychnykh transformatsiy derzhav Tsentral’noyi Aziyi [Tekst] [Vectors of political transformations of Central Asian states]: avtoref. dys. .d-ra polit. nauk: 23.00.02. Nats. akad. nauk Ukrayiny, In-t polit. i etnonats. doslidzh. im. I. F. Kurasa. [Nat. acad. Sciences of Ukraine, Inst. of Flight. and ethno-national. research. them. I. Kuras.]. Kyiv. [In Ukrainian].
Onats’kyy, M. (2019). Klani Turkmenistanu (istoryko-politychnyy aspekt). Prodovzhennya [Clans of Turkmenistan (historical-political aspect). Continuation]. Suchasne suspil’stvo [Modern society], 1. pp. 109-119. [In Ukrainian].
Bul’vins’kiy, A.H. (eds). (2017). Osoblyvosti suspil’no-politychnoyi modernizatsiyi krayin postrazhdans’koho prostoru: monohrafiya [Features of socio-political modernization of the post-Soviet space: a monograph]. Kyiv: DU “Instytut vsesvitn’oyi istoriyi NAN Ukrayiny”. [In Ukrainian].
Holubev, S. (2010). Ochirky politychnoyi istoriyi krayiny “blyzhn’oho zarubizhzhya”: respubliky kolyshn”oho SRSR u 1989-2009 [Essays on the political history of the “near abroad” countries: the republics of the former USSR in 1989-2009]. Tver’: Ariadna. [In Russian].
Hrozyn, A. (2010). Elity Turkmenistana ta tsentral’noaziat•s’ki klany: zahal’ne, osoblyve ta trudnoshchi modernizatsiyi. Aziya ta Afryka s’ohodni [Elites of Turkmenistan and Central Asian clans: general, special and difficulties of modernization]. Aziya i Afrika segodnya [Asia and Africa today], 9, pp. 50-51. [In Russian].
Kadyrov, S. (2007). Etnolohiya upravlinnya v Seredniy Aziyi: vchora, s’ohodni, zavtra. [Ethnology of Management in Central Asia: Yesterday, Today, Tomorrow]. [Online]. Available from: http://www.igpi.ru/bibl/other_articl/1119947605.html [In Russian].
Kadyrov, S. (2007). Turkmenyya: Dvortsovyy perevorot [Turkmenistan: Palace coup]. Aziya i Afryka s’ohodni [Asia and Africa today], 4, pp. 41-45. [In Russian].
Bor, A. (2016). Turkmenistan: vlada, polityka ta petro-avtorytaryzm [Turkmenistan: power, politics and petro-authoritarianism]. [Online]. Available from: https://www.chathamhouse.org/sites/default/files/publications/research/2016-03-08-turkmenistan-bohr-russian.pdf [In Russian].
Investytsiynyy potentsial Turkmenistana. Analiz politychnykh ryskov Investment potential of Turkmenistan. Political risk analysis. (2011). [Investment potential of Turkmenistan. Analysis of political risks]. Moskva: MYPE. [In Russian].
Politychna ta ekonomichna model’ rozvytku Turkmenistanu. (2012). [Political and economical model for development of Turkmenistan]. [Online]. Available from: https: //studopedia.com.ua›1_300758_politichna. [In Ukrainian].
Kalyshevskyy, M. (2014). Turkmenystan: Oppozytsiya v tyskakh “bashyzma”, 25 bereznya. [Turkmenistan: Opposition in the grip of “bashism”]. [Online]. Available from: http://www.cisnews.org/news/tm/7763-oppoziciya-v-tiskah-bashizma.html [In Russian].
“Pokazhy yikh zhyvymy!”. (2007). Spysok vidpadaye v tyur’makh Turkmenistana [“Show them alive!” List of those disappeared in the prisons of Turkmenistan]. [Online]. Mizhnarodna pravozakhysna kampaniya [International Human Rights Campaign]. Available from: https://www.osce.org/ru/odihr/346146?download=true [In Russian].
Federov, . (2007). Turkmeniya: chas zmin? [Turkmenistan: Time for Change?]. Indeks bezpeky [Safety index] [onlayn], 3-4, (90-91), pp. 91-113. [Online]. Available from: http://www.pircenter.org/kosdata/page_doc/p2643_1.pdf [In Russian].
V yakоy storoni hryadet nayblyzhcha revolyutsiya [In which country is the next revolution coming]. Tsentral’naya Azyya [Central Asia]. [Online]. Available from: http://www.centrasia.ru/vote.php?v=0 [In Russian].
Chornyy pisok na bilomu marmuri stolytsi Niyazova. (2009). [Black sand on white marble of the capital Niyazov]. [Online]. Available from: https://www.bbc.com ›istoriya›2009/07›dlyadruku [In Ukrainian].
Turkmeniya: Akmurad Redzhepov pal zhertvoyu rezhymiv, yakyy vin sam i pobuduvav. (2008). [Turkmenistan: Akmurad Rejepov fell victim to the regime he himself built]. [Online]. Available from: https//www.fergananevs.com [In Russian].
Aisha Khan. (2010). Turkmenistan’s Clannish Leader. [Online]. Institute for war and reace reporting. Available from: http://iwpr.net/tk/node/49345 [In English].
Osadchuk, I. (2014). Osoblyvosti formuvannya ta funktsionuvannya pravlyachoyi elity v konteksti “patronazhnoho prezydent•stva” u Turkmenistani [Particularities of the formulation and function of the governing body in the context of “patronage presidentialism” in Turkmenistan]. Pytannya politolohiyi [Questions of political science], 132, pp. 59-62. [In Ukrainian].
Tsentral’na Aziya v Indeksakh vyrobnytstva koruptsiyi. (2020). [Central Asia in the Corruption Perceptions Index] [Online]. Available from: http://theopenasia.net/articles/detail/tsentralnaya-aziya-v-indekse-vospriyatiya-korruptsii [In Russian].
Kaymakov, B .(2008). Zoloti yaytsya zolotoho veku [Golden eggs of the golden age]. [Online]. Neytral’nyy Turkmenistan [Neutral Turkmenistan]. Available from: http://www.gundogar.org/?0130457 [In Russian].
Collins, K. (2004). The logic of clan politics. Evidence from the Central Asian trajectories. World politics, 2, (56), рр. 224-261. [In English].
European Community Regional Strategy Paper for Assistance to Central Asia for the period 2007-2013. [Online]. Available from: http://eeas.europa.eu/central_asia/rsp/07_13_en.pdf [In English].
Nalohovyy kodeks Turkmenistana. (2008). [Tax Code of Turkmenistan]. [Online]. Available from: http://www. turkmenbusiness.org [In Russian].
Strany myra. Ékonomyka Turkmenystana. (2018). [Countries of the world. Economy of Turkmenistan]. [Online]. Available from: http://iformatsiya.ru/asia/374-yekonomika-turkmenistana.html [In Russian].
Zvit pro rezul’taty diyal’nosti. Derzhavna statystyka Ukrayiny za 2020 rik. (2021). [Performance report. Of State Statistics of Ukraine for 2020]. [Online]. Available from: http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua›zvit›zvit_DC020 [In Ukrainian].