The crisis of European Security System: Causes and Consequences
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article analyzes changes and processes within the European security environment. As a result of Russian aggression against Ukraine, European security as a system of arranged relations was unbalanced, and during the Russian-Ukrainian war of 2022-2026, it entered a state of multiphase crisis.
The critical escalation of contradictions between the leading participants in the European security system resulted in the breakdown of traditional ties and a revision of the terms and principles of international relations between states participating in multilateral interactions within the OSCE area. The “Ukrainian crisis” has had a significant impact on political processes and contributed to the overall destabilization of the global international system.
The purpose of this study is to identify the stages of the crisis of European security as a model of relations established between 1990 and 2022, and to elucidate the state of European security in terms of the possibility or impossibility of restoring its structural format. Identifying political and structural changes at different stages of the European security crisis allows to assert that the first significant challenge to the European security model, built on a combination of all-European commitments and cooperation principles and the synchronized expansion of NATO and the EU, was the US-NATO military operation in Yugoslavia (1999). The aggravation of contradictions between European and Euro-Atlantic institutions and Russia was accompanied by claims by the Moscow leadership to recognize Russia’s special, preferential interests in the post-Soviet space.
The unfolding of direct Russian aggression against Ukraine demonstrated the ineffectiveness of the European security model enshrined in a series of CSCE/OSCE documents and multilateral decisions adopted between 1975 and 1999. The sluggish response of most transatlantic states to the escalating crisis in Russian-Ukrainian relations contributed to the fragmentation of the OSCE area into local zones with different security regimes. The subsequent polarization within Western alliances and associations demonstrated the inadequacy of existing security mechanisms for the new conditions. The European security model tested between 1990 and 2022 has crossed a line before which the crisis could have been considered adaptive. Structural changes across the ‘Wider Europe’ area determine the inevitability of new forms of organizing interactions between the main actors in the Transatlantic region and Northern Eurasia, including the United States, Russia, and the “European troika” of Great Britain, France, and Germany.
Downloads
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
References
Tolstov, S. (2013). Mizhnarodna systema pochatku XXI stolittya. Ch. 2. Zovnishni spravy, 10, pp. 8-13. [In Ukrainian].
Charter of the United Nations. 26.06.1945. Ofitsiynyy pereklad. [Online]. Available from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_010#Text [In Ukrainian].
Zhenevsʹka Zayava vid 17 kvitnya 2014 roku. Ministerstvo zakordonnykh sprav Ukrayiny. 18 kvitnya 2014 r. [Online]. Available from: https://mfa.gov.ua/news/1050-zhenevsyka-zajava-vid-17-kvitnya-2014-roku [In Ukrainian].
CSCE. Charter of Paris for a New Europe. Paris, 19-21 November 1990. 29 p. [Online]. Available from: https://www.osce.org/sites/default/files/f/documents/0/6/39516.pdf [In English].
CSCE. Helsinki Document 1992 The Challenges of Change. 9-10 July 1992. CSCE, 1992. 38 p. [Online]. Available from: https://www.osce.org/sites/default/files/f/documents/7/c/39530.pdf [In English].
OSCE. Istanbul Document 1999. [PCOEW389]. Istanbul: OSCE, 1999 [January 2000/Corr.]. 252 p. [Online]. Available from: https://www.osce.org/sites/default/files/f/documents/6/5/39569.pdf [In English].
Makron proponuye stvoryty novyy format yevropeysʹkoyi spivpratsi, vidkrytyy dlya Ukrayiny ta Brytaniyi. Yevropeysʹka pravda. 9 travnya 2022. [Online]. Available from: https://www.eurointegration.com.ua/news/2022/05/9/7139123/ [In Ukrainian].
“Dogovor mezhdu Rossiyskoy Federatsiyey i Soyedinennymi Shtatami Ameriki o garantiyakh bezopasnosti”. Proyekt. MID RF. 17.12.2021. [Online]. Available from: https://mid.ru/ru/foreign_policy/rso/nato/1790818/ [In Russian].
“Soglasheniye o merakh obespecheniya bezopasnosti Rossiyskoy Federatsii i gosudarstv-chlenov Organizatsii Severoatlanticheskogo dogovora”. Proyekt. MID RF. 17.12.2021. [Online]. Available from: https://mid.ru/ru/foreign_policy/vnesnepoliticeskoe-dos-e/dvustoronnie-otnosenij-rossii-s-inostrannymi-gosudarstvami/rossia-nato/1790803/ [In Russian].
Ukaz Prezidenta Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 31.12.2015 g. № 683 O Strategii natsional'noy bezopasnosti Rossiyskoy Federatsii. [Online]. Available from: http://www.kremlin.ru/acts/bank/40391 [In Russian].
Allison, R. (2017). Russia and the post-2014 international legal order: revisionism and realpolitik. International Affairs, May, Vol. 93, Issue 3, pp. 519–543. [Online]. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iix061 [In English].
Aleksandrov, O., Palamarchuk, M. (eds) (2025). Perspektyvy formuvannya novoyi yevropeysʹkoyi systemy bezpeky ta mistse v niy Ukrayiny: analitychna dopovidʹ. Kyiv: NISD. [Online]. Available from: https://niss.gov.ua/sites/default/files/2025-10/ad_evropeyska-sistema-bezpeki_10102025_zamina 2810.pdf [In Ukrainian].
Council of the European Union. Strategic Compass for Security and Defence. 7371/22. Brussels, 21 March 2022. [Online]. Available from: https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-7371-2022-INIT/en/pdf [In English].
Clapp, S. (2022). Russia’s war on Ukraine: Reflections on European security, neutrality and strategic orientation. European Parliamentary Research Service. PE 729.450. May. [Online]. Available from: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2022/729450/ EPRS_BRI%282022%29729450_EN.pdf [In English].
Kommunike Vilʹnyusʹkoho sammitu. Vydane hlavamy derzhav i uryadiv krayin-chleniv NATO, yaki vzyaly uchastʹ u zasidanni Pivnichnoatlantychnoyi rady u Vilʹnyusi 11 lypnya 2023 r. North Atlantic Treaty Organization. [Online]. Available from: https://www.nato.int/en/about-us/official-texts-and-resources/official-texts/2023/07/11/vilnius-summit-communique [In Ukrainian].
Deklaratsiya Haazʹkoho sammitu vydano hlavamy derzhav i uryadiv, yaki vzyaly uchastʹ u zasidanni Pivnichnoatlantychnoyi rady u Haazi, 25 chervnya 2025 roku. North Atlantic Treaty Organization. [Online]. Available from: https://www.nato.int/en/about-us/official-texts-and-resources/official-texts/2025/06/25/the-hague-summit-declaration [In Ukrainian].
Bankova, Yu. (2026, 05 sichnya). Shcho prynese Ukrayini ta svitu 2026 rik – try stsenariyi. Prohnoz Horbulina ta Badraka. Holovnyy portal Natsionalʹnoyi akademiyi nauk Ukrayiny. [Online]. Available from: https://www.nas.gov.ua/news/akademik-volodimir-gorbulin-i-viyskoviy-ekspert-valentin-badrak--pro-tri-scenari-dlya-ukrani-ta-svitu-na-2026-rik [In Ukrainian].